There is a pressing need for increased public observation of family court proceedings. We encourage concerned citizens to engage as Court Watch observers in family courts throughout California and beyond.
Contact the Judicial Council with your observations and feedback.
Send your observations to independent journalists.
Transparency and accountability within the judicial branch remain essential priorities. Contact your state representative and advocate for:
These measures promote efficiency, reduce unnecessary litigation costs, and help families reach sustainable agreements.
Access to justice remains uneven across economic lines. Contact your state representatives and demand:
Individuals with disabilities face additional barriers when navigating complex court procedures. Advocate for:
Note: While attorney pro bono participation is valuable, we also support exploring alternative models—including paralegals, law students, and other legal professionals and others —to expand available assistance.
Accurate records are essential for due process and appellate rights. Contact your state representatives and advocate for:
Sacramento County Judges and Court Employees Serve on State Judicial Council Committees
https://saccourt.ca.gov/general/docs/nr-jcc-appointments-111924.Pdf
Should Expert Witnesses Work Directly for Plaintiffs?
https://blog.seakexperts.com/should-expert-witnesses-work-directly-for-plaintiffs/
Limited Licensed Legal Technicians (Washington)
Court-Related Legislation
Self-Represented Litigants and the New Normal in Family Court
https://nvbar.org/wp-content/uploads/NevadaLawyer_Dec2023_Self-Represented-Litigants.pdf
Handling Cases Involving Self-Represented Litigants
https://www.courts.ca.gov/partners/documents/benchguide_self_rep_litigants.pdf
Every year, millions try to navigate US courts without a lawyer
https://theconversation.com/every-year-millions-try-to-navigate-us-courts-without-a-lawyer-84159
Self-Represented Litigants and the Code of Judicial Conduct
https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/15798/proselitigantsjan2016.pdf
Statewide Action Plan for Serving Self-Represented Litigants
Personal recommendation: Read the CJP Complaint Form carefully. Use the models for your best effort. Don't expect anything to happen, but if we all file valid complaints, there is at least a paper trail to demonstrate the ongoing abuses of power in the family court system and lack of disciplinary action. Check LOCAL RULES for your Local Committee on the Elimination of Bias. RED ALERT: There does not appear to be ANY independent oversight of Child Custody Recommending Counselors.
CCP 170.6 is a PEREMPTORY Challenge; See CCP 170.1
https://saclaw.org/resource_library/peremptory-challenge-of-a-judge/
Professor David Freeman Engstrom, co-director of the Stanford Center on the Legal Profession (CLP)
California Code of Judicial Ethics
https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/ca_code_judicial_ethics.pdf
Personal recommendations: File the peremptory challenge of a judge before your case is heard in El Dorado County Family Court. The judge considered most fair is Gary Slossberg. Best of Luck! If you are mandated to attend Child Custody Recommending Counseling, check the local rules for challenging the appointment. You can review the case for court reform in the downloads section of this website.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.